All rights reserved.
The Pitts Resolution
The Pitts Resolution, January 29, 2000, Pitts, Georgia
To all who love the cause and kingdom of Christ here in the earth:
Many of us have been concerned for several years now about the
unscriptural practices and doctrines which are being introduced among
the Primitive Baptist churches in many places in Georgia and in other
states. It is our hope and prayer that God may use this general letter to all
of our churches as a means of awakening some to the seriousness of the
situation that now exists among us. If we disregard the teachings of God's
word and place the hope and future of the church in the inventions of men,
we will soon lose our identity as the church of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Specifically, the following false practices and doctrines (among others)
have appeared among us in recent years:
Sunday Schools or Organized Bible Study Classes
Tithing
Youth Camps
Teaching that the Great Commission was given to the church, rather than
to the Apostles
Mission Programs
Accepting and Retaining Unqualified Members
Theological Seminaries (Preacher's Schools)
Misdirected Ministerial Authority
Dedication of Infants Ordaining Novices
Salaried Ministry
Failure to Recognize Church Authority
We find these doctrines and practices to be without warrant in the word of
God, and to be in opposition to the clear teachings of Christ and the
Apostles.
We would make the following recommendations to our churches, and to
the members thereof, that we take the following action:
First, to be aware and to make others aware of the onslaught of
unscriptural practices and doctrines that are now appearing among us in
many places.
Second, that every effort be put forth to save to the cause the preachers
and churches who may unknowingly have embraced any of these
doctrines and practices. There are good God-called ministers who have
been led to follow these teachings, and good churches that have blindly
followed a loved pastor without realizing that they have dishonored their
heritage and embraced heresy by doing so. Let every effort be made to
save them to the cause (James 5:20).
Third, we would encourage all of our churches everywhere to put forth
every effort to keep these false doctrines and practices from being
promoted among us (1 Tim. 4:14-16). Will we invite a preacher to the
church of our membership (or one we pastor) when we know that he
advocates and participates in practices that are contrary to the
scriptures? God help us to stand and to close our pulpits to heresy and
error, as did our brethren in the faith before us (II John 10, 11).
Brethren, will we stand where our forefathers in the faith stood, or will we
continue to drift with the tide until God manifests his displeasure and
sends us into the captivity of Babylon? Then how will we sing the Lord's
song in a strange land?
We have neither the power, nor scriptural authority, to decide matters for
any church or group of churches. It is up to each local church to decide
whether or not she will take a public stand for the basic principles of truth
contained in this resolution.
In love for Zion and for the cause of the truth, we, the undersigned
respectfully submit this resolution. We attach to this resolution an
addendum giving scriptural and historical references concerning this
matter.
ADDENDUM TO THE PITTS RESOLUTION OF THE OLD LINE
PRIMITIVE BAPTISTS
Item I, SUNDAY SCHOOLS OR ORGANIZED BIBLE STUDY CLASSES
This invention of man, 1781 years too late to have a scriptural basis,
usually begins with the name of "Bible Study." From the origin and
promise that it is simply the study of the scriptures under the teaching of
the pastor, it soon grows to a study of literature prepared by man and the
division of the church body into classes according to age and/or sex, with
women teachers. (But we do encourage individual study of the Bible, Acts
17:10_11). What saith the scriptures? Eph. 6:4, 1 Cor. 12:25, Rev.
22:18_19, Deut. 4:2, Prov. 30:5_6, Eccl. 3:14, Jer. 26:2, John 8:31_32.
It is an intrinsic part of the scriptures that they not be added to or
diminished therefrom (Deut. 4:2, Rev. 22:18_19). Therefore, our
forefathers, subsequent to the writings of the New Testament, have stood
firmly on the principles taught therein. Their stance against Bible Study
sessions, as an adjunct to the gospel church, is embedded in history.
Bible study classes are a close ally to Sunday Schools, as stated above,
which the Old School (Primitive) Baptists declared against in the Black
Rock Address in 1832. Here is a quote from that declaration: "..such
schools were never established by the apostles, nor commanded by
Christ. There were children in the days of the apostles. The apostles
possessed as great a desire for the salvation of souls, as much love to
the cause of Christ, and knew as well what God would own for bringing
persons to the knowledge of salvation, as any do this day. We, therefore
must believe that if these schools were of God, we should find some
account of them in the New Testament."
This stated position was also promulgated, with amplification, by
forty_two Primitive Baptist elders in attendance at the Nashville Peace
Meeting in 1937. The following is a quote from item 18, under the heading
of discipline, which resulted from the referenced meeting: "As to Sunday
Schools, Bible Classes, aid societies, or any other such societies as
have been invented by the world and engaged in by them, we consider all
such as a departure from the original ground and principles which the
Primitive Baptists have held to all along the line. The way such things
usually get into the church is by the assuming of some name that may lead
our people to think there is no harm in it; but such innovations and
departures always grow, and result in trouble and distress among the
people. They should be left severely alone. If we want peace, the way to
have it is to let all things alone that bring trouble.... The preacher cannot
perform the public service of God for the entire membership. We cannot
serve God by proxy. It is, too, a lamentable fact that our brethren do not
read the scriptures in their homes as they should. Hence, they depend too
much on the preacher to know "if these things be true." But this in no
sense justifies our people in conducting a so_called Bible class or Bible
study in our churches. Such things, when the seed is sown, always grow
and develop into greater and distressing things. We can only say,
"Diligently do what we recommend, and let the other things alone."
These references and quotes are more than adequate in stipulating the
reason why old_line Primitive Baptists object to organized Bible study
classes, in their (our) churches, apart from the regular public worship
services.
Item II, YOUTH CAMPS
Like Sunday Schools, this is an invention of man seeking to indoctrinate
and persuade the young and gain more members for the church. Please
see scriptures listed under Item I.
Primitive Baptists, in the main, do not object to their children participating
in good wholesome sports programs, including youth camps, where
religious dogmas are not a part of the program. Children of Primitive
Baptists do participate in school sponsored sports programs and in other
recreational functions, including sports activities, of their communities.
However, the preponderance of our people do object to such activities
being placed under the auspices of an Old Line Primitive Baptist Church.
Neither scripture nor Primitive Baptist tradition support the establishment
of church connected youth camps. Therefore, we deem it an unscriptural
practice because its existence is not substantiated in the book of inspired
writ.
New innovations, in the church, cannot improve on the scriptural pattern
for teaching our children; i.e., "And ye fathers, provoke not your children to
wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord" (Eph.
6:4).
Item III, MISSION PROGRAMS
Mission programs organized by man and funded by appeals to various
congregations for their support are unscriptural. We find an organized
program to promote "mission work" without warrant in the scriptures,
especially a program in which no preacher goes to labor other than
infrequent visits of a few days. What saith the scriptures? Matt.10:5_10,
Acts 18:11; 20:31; 28:30, Gal. 1:15_17, II Tim. 4:5.
Primitive Baptists have no objections to their ministers doing evangelistic
work, among those who have not been privileged to have the gospel
preached to them, for Paul charged Timothy to "do the work of an
evangelist." Consequently, if a minister feels led of the Spirit to go, as an
evangelist, to a specific location, whether it be domestic or foreign, we
believe he should go. However, he should follow the New Testament
pattern of evangelism, that is, he should go to the area where he feels the
Spirit has directed him and remain there until converted brethren and
sisters are established in doctrine, practice and discipline (this may take
a few years). A failure to labor to this end, with those newly converted to
the gospel church, results in a great injustice to them and is an
embarrassment to established churches.
Item IV, THEOLOGICAL SEMINARIES (PREACHER'S SCHOOLS)
Seminaries train and educate preachers in the teachings of men, and so
direct their ministry according to man's standards. Brethren, make no
mistake, a five day seminar or preachers' meeting (school) is nothing but
a mini_seminary and will soon grow into a full_blown seminary. What saith
the scriptures? Heb. 5:4, Gal. 1:15_17, John 14:26; 16:13_14, I John 2:27.
A national preachers' meeting, which is a new thing among Primitive
Baptists, was introduced to our ministry in 1992. It continued, perpetually,
each year through the remainder of the decade of the 90s; if its
participants do not repent it will continue into the current millennium. This
event has been the source of more unrest among the Primitive Baptist
family than any other known activity or practice. It has caused, and
continues to cause, much disturbance throughout our country. The
disturbance and unrest is justified, abundantly, because such a meeting
does not have a scriptural foundation or precedent; it is a new and
superfluous thing among us. Furthermore, it is the bed where many of the
seeds of heresy are sown.
The activities engaged in by the attendees makes the referenced meeting
equivalent to a preachers' school (school of theology). We know that true
Old School Primitive Baptists declared against Theological Schools over
a hundred and sixty years ago. Our brethren from that era (1832) said it
better than we can. Therefore, we quote from the Black Rock Address:
"As to theological schools, we shall at present content ourselves with
saying that they are a reflection upon the faithfulness of the Holy Ghost,
who is engaged according to the promise of the great Head of the church
to lead the disciples into all truth. See John 16:13. Also, that in every age,
from the school of Alexandria down to this day, they have been a real pest
to the church of Christ. Of this we could produce abundant proof, did the
limits of our address admit their insertion." The firm convictions of those
who framed the Black Rock Address, is further echoed and amplified by
able ministers of the late 1800s and early 1900s. A quote from one, Elder
J. H. Oliphant, in the early 1900s, is as follows: "Here is a secret to
pastoring a Church. Teach [them] that everything new in religion is false,
and when elders get to be progressive and want to modernize our people,
avoid them, and encourage the members to be content with things taught
in the Word."
To those brethren who frequent and support this new function, we humbly
beseech you to repent and abandon your support thereof. Please help us
to circumvent further strife, within the family of God, about this auxiliary.
All of the above practices are without commandment or precedent in the
scriptures, and thus have no place in the Kingdom of God. "For
whatsoever is not of faith is sin." Rom. 14:23. [Have you read in God's
word where the Apostles ever held Bible study classes, Sunday Schools,
youth camps, or founded ministerial schools or mission programs?]
Item V, DEDICATION OF INFANTS
The dedication of infants in the church service is another practice for
which there is no New Testament basis, in either precept or example. In
this practice, the minister prays over the infant for the purpose of
"dedicating" him or her to the Lord, even when no evidence has been
shown that the infant has been regenerated or is even a member of God's
elect family. What saith the scriptures? John 3:3,5; I John 5:1
Item VI, SALARIED MINISTRY
By "salaried ministry," we are referring to a system of business
agreements in which a preacher agrees to serve a church with the
promise of receiving a stipulated payment of a set amount of money for
each given period. What saith the scriptures? Matt. 10:8; John 10:12_13;
Acts 20:33_34, 28:30; I Cor. 4:11_12, 9:16_18; I Peter 5:1_2.
The practice of churches (or preachers) establishing a fixed salary for
gospel ministers is in direct conflict with the teachings of the New
Testament. The Apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthian brethren: "What is
my reward then? Verily that, when I preach the gospel, I make the gospel
of God without charge, that I abuse not my power in the gospel" (I Cor.
9:18). We can judge from this statement that the apostle Paul would not
have even considered asking for a certain salary in return for his services
at a particular church. In the same chapter, Paul stated concerning gospel
ministers; "...he that ploweth should plow in hope..." (I Cor. 9:10). In a
system where there is an established salary, the minister is not "plowing
in hope."
Moreover, the salaried system is in conflict with the spiritual nature of
God's kingdom, which kingdom (Christ said) "is not of this world" (John
18:36). This system brings the following elements of the world into the
church; "hired" services, negotiated salaries, business propositions, pay
raises, the pursuit of large churches based upon higher salaries, and
moving from a small church to a larger church being considered as a
"promotion" (even if the small church is more spiritual).
Item VII, TITHING
Tithing as a commandment or example for the New Testament Church is
refuted by Rom. 6:14, I Cor. 16:1_2 and II Cor. 9:7.
Our brethren in the Armenian community recognize that "It (tithing _ D.
Jones) cannot be affirmed that the Old Testament law of tithes is binding
on the Christian Church" (Today's Dictionary of the Bible, page 624). In
chapter IX, under the caption "Characteristics of the Apostolic Church" of
Elder Hassell's History, he made a quote and statement as follows:
Quote, "The voluntary system" says Mr. Schaff, "best corresponds with the
spirit of the gospel, was practiced by the church for the first three
centuries, and is the most advantageous to the kingdom of God. Legal
enactments for the payment of tithes to the ministry, as to the priests
among the Jews, are not met with in Christendom before the sixth
century." Hassell's statement: "regular stipulated ministerial salaries,
though unknown in the apostolic church and in the first three centuries, are
given in nearly all the religious denominations of the United States, but not
among Old School, Primitive or Bible Baptists."
The tithes system was applicable to the Jewish economy, under the law,
in Old Testament times. It is not to be practiced in the New Testament
Gospel Church. Paul informed the Galatians that "the law is not of faith"
(Gal. 3:12). He also said, "But now we are delivered from the law, that
being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of
spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter" (Rom. 7:6).
Item VIII, THAT THE "GREAT COMMISSION" WAS GIVEN TO THE
CHURCH
We find no scriptural basis for the belief that the "great commission" was
given to the church and that the church is responsible for the spread of the
gospel in the world today and therefore is justified in organizing programs
and raising funds for this purpose. What saith the scriptures? Mark
16:14_15; Acts 1:2, 8; Col. 1:6, 23.
Shortly before His ascension, Christ commanded His apostles to
"go...into all the world, and preach the gospel unto every creature" (Mark
16:15). (This command is commonly referred to as the "great
commission," although this term is not found in the Scriptures). The
Scriptures make it abundantly clear that the apostles did indeed fulfill this
command. Several years after the command was given, the apostle Paul
reported that the gospel had come into "all the world" (Col. 1:6) and had
been "preached to every creature which is under heaven" (Col. 1:23).
Moreover, when Christ placed this "great commission" upon His apostles,
He promised them that great signs and wonders would accompany the
fulfilling of this commission. These signs would be in the form of special
apostolic powers, such as the ability to cast out demons and the ability to
drink any sort of deadly poison and remain unharmed (Mark 16:17_18).
We take the fact that these special powers are no longer with us as further
proof that the "great commission" has been fulfilled.
We stand with our Baptist forefathers in rejecting the heresy that the
"great commission" was given to the church body. Elder John R. Daily
(one of our Baptist forefathers) explained: "None of us believe that the
commission given by Christ to His apostles was intended to be laid upon
the church as a body, which false idea has been the parent of all
Missionary machinery that has ever been invented" (Advocate and
Messenger, "More Specificity Requested," July 1996, pg. 149).
Item IX, ACCEPTING UNQUALIFIED PERSONS AS CHURCH
MEMBERS
Encouraging children to join the church before there is evidence of the
new birth. Accepting baptism of questionable background or authority.
Not qualifying those who apply for membership as to secret orders, living
in adultery or evidence of the new birth. All of this speaks of a belief that
anything goes and any way is all right if it gets us more members. What
saith the scriptures? Acts 2:47; John 3:3,5; Neh. 2:20; Matt. 3:7.
Item X, MISDIRECTED MINISTERIAL AUTHORITY
For forty years or more, we have sat complacent, and passively listened
to our ministry criticize and chip away at some of our long_standing
church practices. While they criticized the existing church practices, they
were maneuvering themselves into a position of lordship rather than
servants; thus, usurping authority over the church. Both the church and
ministry are responsible for the development of this situation; i.e., the
lackadaisical attitude of the majority of the church membership coupled
with a misdirected zeal of some of our ministry.
Paul identified the ministry of his day as servants (II Cor. 4:5). Peter said
they were to "feed the flock of God...taking the oversight" (I Peter 5:2_3).
This did not mean to rule over or lord over God's heritage. We, as gospel
ministers, would do well to build on these scriptural foundations.
Historically, and in the main, the church has been cognizant of these
fundamental principles. An examination of a middle Georgia church's
decorum, which was constituted in mid_nineteenth century, reveals that
they delineated specifically the duties of a moderator, or pastor, which is
"It shall be the duty of the moderator to preserve order and explain and put
questions, and render assistance if needed." From this statement it is
evidenced that our forefathers recognized and respected their pastor as a
servant.
The idea that a pastor is supposed to rule the church and that his charge,
to the church, is to be followed implicitly and without any question is a new
thing in the Primitive Baptist Church. This doctrine leads to doing away
with annual pastor calls and conference meetings. The deacons and
members are taught that they are not to question this supposed pastoral
authority. This is often accompanied by instructions not to visit other
churches, associations or fellowship meetings (Prov. 19:10; Jer. 12:10;
Eph. 1:22_23; Isa. 32:1; Heb. 13:7, 17). Please note that the latter two
scriptural references do not speak of those who are rulers, but those who
have the rule (Christ and His princes, writers of N.T.).
Our prayer is that church members will recognize the fallacy of allowing
servants to rule. Also, that they will reclaim their authority and return to
church government as it was in earlier times. Furthermore, ministers may
need to be reminded, from time to time, that they are servants and not
lords. No matter how big a preacher may feel to be, he is still under the
jurisdiction of the church.
Item XI, ORDAINING NOVICES
Hastily ordaining unknown, untried and/or self_willed men to the gospel
ministry and to the office of deacon is a blatant violation of the scriptural
guidelines. What saith the scriptures? Neh. 7:64_65; 1 Tim. 3:6, 5:22;
Heb. 5:4.
Item XII, FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE CHURCH AUTHORITY
There are situations where brethren (especially preachers) and churches
fail to recognize the discipline of sister churches. When this occurs, it
generates strife among those involved and ripples of discontentment are
felt, where knowledge of it exists, throughout the Primitive Baptist family.
This problem has been addressed many times in the past and we
reiterate the advice given by brethren, in their respective eras, for the
resolution thereof: "When a person is excluded by an orderly Old Baptist
Church, he is thereby excluded from every orderly Old Baptist Church on
earth. If a person is excluded by one church in our body, and another
receives him into their body without satisfaction first being made at the
church where he was excluded, it is denied that a sister church has the
right to discipline her own members. It is too often the case that when a
little friction comes up, brethren may be quick to receive members this
way. When something is charged against a person, that is the only place
on earth to get the charge canceled" (Nashville Peace Meeting).
"Each and every local church has the right to dispose of her local affairs
as she deems proper; that is, she has a right to discipline her members,
but no church has the right to harbor and protect heretics, liars,
fornicators, and such like (excluded members from a sister church_W.
Hatfield), to the hurt and annoyance of sister churches. Neither does a
church have a right to harbor or engage in things that are contrary to
Baptist usage, or contrary to the scriptures" (Waco and Nashville Peace
Meetings).
"Should a church as such depart from the Bible faith and practice and so
persist in it as to cause offence, then what? The first church offended, as
represented by two or three of her most spiritual members (Gal. 6:1)
should go quietly and labor in love and all long_suffering to reclaim her,
failing, she should return and take one or two other churches to labor in
love; and these failing, and agreeing and advising, should proceed to
"bind her on earth" as in the name of Jesus Christ, declaring her
disposed of Gospel Order" (Dallas Peace Meeting).
To censure a church, or condemn a church, or non_fellowship a church or
churches in doctrine or practice, without labor, or trial or investigation is
disorder of the discipline, doctrine and practice of the church" (Dallas
Peace Meeting)
RESOLUTION STATEMENT
We have identified, in this addendum, some of the problematic issues
(little foxes) which are causing widespread unrest among Primitive
Baptists in this era. Applicable issues are itemized with scriptural
references which justify our opposition to their addition, as an adjunct
and/or practice, to the Old Line Primitive Baptist Church. We have also
included quotes of highly esteemed brethren, from the past, which depict
their stand against some of the unscriptural practices we are currently
facing.
As to our recommendation: We recommend that those who preach these
false doctrines, and/or otherwise advocate referenced practices, not to
be utilized (used) in our services. We are plainly instructed to "receive him
(them) not into your (our) house, neither bid him (them) God speed" (II
John 10). And those who follow after them are called "silly women
(churches)" (II Tim. 3:6).
Elder Sylvester Hassell writing on the early 1800"s mentions "the
incredible changes among Baptists" of that day "springing up of Mission
Societies, Sunday Schools, Theological colleges, written
sermons...salaried ministers...efforts for large gain in membership." He
summarized this in these words, which seem to us to appropriately
describe the condition existing among our people today: "False doctrines
led to false practices; confidence lost in God and placed in man"
(Hassell's History, page xxii).
Our brethren back then stood firmly against all of these institutions of man.
The Kehukee Association of North Carolina in 1827 agreed "that we
discard all Missionary Societies, Bible Societies and Theological
Seminaries, and if any persons should be among us as agents of any of
said societies, we hereafter discountenance them in those practices; and
if under a character of a minister of the gospel, WE WILL NOT INVITE
THEM INTO OUR PULPITS; believing these societies and institutions to
be the inventions of men, and not warranted from the word of God"
(Hassell's History, pages 736, 737). The Baltimore Association in 1832
meeting at Black Rock Church in the state of Maryland, also specifically
enumerated Sunday schools, mission programs and theological schools
as some of the practices which brought forth the division among Baptists
of that day ("Feast on Fat Things", pages 5_33).
Here in Georgia, the original articles of the constitution of the Original
Upper Canoochee Primitive Baptist Association of Georgia, and still
carried in their minutes today, state: "We decline to recognize anything
not specifically authorized in the New Testament and practiced by the
Apostles. We hold that modern Sunday Schools, religious societies and
organizations separate from the church, known as auxiliaries to the
church, a salaried ministry, assessing or taxing the membership,
instrument music in church worship are unscriptural, and together with
oath bound secret societies, will not be held in fellowship by this
association."
Where do we stand? Will we go along with the notions of the day until the
identity of the church is lost and we are just one of the hundreds of
religious organizations in America, the same in a lack of doctrine and
discipline and with a house full of worldly practices?
We pray that God will grant us the grace to walk in the old paths and to
contend for the faith once delivered to the saints!
To all who love the cause and kingdom of Christ here in the earth:
Many of us have been concerned for several years now about the
unscriptural practices and doctrines which are being introduced among
the Primitive Baptist churches in many places in Georgia and in other
states. It is our hope and prayer that God may use this general letter to all
of our churches as a means of awakening some to the seriousness of the
situation that now exists among us. If we disregard the teachings of God's
word and place the hope and future of the church in the inventions of men,
we will soon lose our identity as the church of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Specifically, the following false practices and doctrines (among others)
have appeared among us in recent years:
Sunday Schools or Organized Bible Study Classes
Tithing
Youth Camps
Teaching that the Great Commission was given to the church, rather than
to the Apostles
Mission Programs
Accepting and Retaining Unqualified Members
Theological Seminaries (Preacher's Schools)
Misdirected Ministerial Authority
Dedication of Infants Ordaining Novices
Salaried Ministry
Failure to Recognize Church Authority
We find these doctrines and practices to be without warrant in the word of
God, and to be in opposition to the clear teachings of Christ and the
Apostles.
We would make the following recommendations to our churches, and to
the members thereof, that we take the following action:
First, to be aware and to make others aware of the onslaught of
unscriptural practices and doctrines that are now appearing among us in
many places.
Second, that every effort be put forth to save to the cause the preachers
and churches who may unknowingly have embraced any of these
doctrines and practices. There are good God-called ministers who have
been led to follow these teachings, and good churches that have blindly
followed a loved pastor without realizing that they have dishonored their
heritage and embraced heresy by doing so. Let every effort be made to
save them to the cause (James 5:20).
Third, we would encourage all of our churches everywhere to put forth
every effort to keep these false doctrines and practices from being
promoted among us (1 Tim. 4:14-16). Will we invite a preacher to the
church of our membership (or one we pastor) when we know that he
advocates and participates in practices that are contrary to the
scriptures? God help us to stand and to close our pulpits to heresy and
error, as did our brethren in the faith before us (II John 10, 11).
Brethren, will we stand where our forefathers in the faith stood, or will we
continue to drift with the tide until God manifests his displeasure and
sends us into the captivity of Babylon? Then how will we sing the Lord's
song in a strange land?
We have neither the power, nor scriptural authority, to decide matters for
any church or group of churches. It is up to each local church to decide
whether or not she will take a public stand for the basic principles of truth
contained in this resolution.
In love for Zion and for the cause of the truth, we, the undersigned
respectfully submit this resolution. We attach to this resolution an
addendum giving scriptural and historical references concerning this
matter.
ADDENDUM TO THE PITTS RESOLUTION OF THE OLD LINE
PRIMITIVE BAPTISTS
Item I, SUNDAY SCHOOLS OR ORGANIZED BIBLE STUDY CLASSES
This invention of man, 1781 years too late to have a scriptural basis,
usually begins with the name of "Bible Study." From the origin and
promise that it is simply the study of the scriptures under the teaching of
the pastor, it soon grows to a study of literature prepared by man and the
division of the church body into classes according to age and/or sex, with
women teachers. (But we do encourage individual study of the Bible, Acts
17:10_11). What saith the scriptures? Eph. 6:4, 1 Cor. 12:25, Rev.
22:18_19, Deut. 4:2, Prov. 30:5_6, Eccl. 3:14, Jer. 26:2, John 8:31_32.
It is an intrinsic part of the scriptures that they not be added to or
diminished therefrom (Deut. 4:2, Rev. 22:18_19). Therefore, our
forefathers, subsequent to the writings of the New Testament, have stood
firmly on the principles taught therein. Their stance against Bible Study
sessions, as an adjunct to the gospel church, is embedded in history.
Bible study classes are a close ally to Sunday Schools, as stated above,
which the Old School (Primitive) Baptists declared against in the Black
Rock Address in 1832. Here is a quote from that declaration: "..such
schools were never established by the apostles, nor commanded by
Christ. There were children in the days of the apostles. The apostles
possessed as great a desire for the salvation of souls, as much love to
the cause of Christ, and knew as well what God would own for bringing
persons to the knowledge of salvation, as any do this day. We, therefore
must believe that if these schools were of God, we should find some
account of them in the New Testament."
This stated position was also promulgated, with amplification, by
forty_two Primitive Baptist elders in attendance at the Nashville Peace
Meeting in 1937. The following is a quote from item 18, under the heading
of discipline, which resulted from the referenced meeting: "As to Sunday
Schools, Bible Classes, aid societies, or any other such societies as
have been invented by the world and engaged in by them, we consider all
such as a departure from the original ground and principles which the
Primitive Baptists have held to all along the line. The way such things
usually get into the church is by the assuming of some name that may lead
our people to think there is no harm in it; but such innovations and
departures always grow, and result in trouble and distress among the
people. They should be left severely alone. If we want peace, the way to
have it is to let all things alone that bring trouble.... The preacher cannot
perform the public service of God for the entire membership. We cannot
serve God by proxy. It is, too, a lamentable fact that our brethren do not
read the scriptures in their homes as they should. Hence, they depend too
much on the preacher to know "if these things be true." But this in no
sense justifies our people in conducting a so_called Bible class or Bible
study in our churches. Such things, when the seed is sown, always grow
and develop into greater and distressing things. We can only say,
"Diligently do what we recommend, and let the other things alone."
These references and quotes are more than adequate in stipulating the
reason why old_line Primitive Baptists object to organized Bible study
classes, in their (our) churches, apart from the regular public worship
services.
Item II, YOUTH CAMPS
Like Sunday Schools, this is an invention of man seeking to indoctrinate
and persuade the young and gain more members for the church. Please
see scriptures listed under Item I.
Primitive Baptists, in the main, do not object to their children participating
in good wholesome sports programs, including youth camps, where
religious dogmas are not a part of the program. Children of Primitive
Baptists do participate in school sponsored sports programs and in other
recreational functions, including sports activities, of their communities.
However, the preponderance of our people do object to such activities
being placed under the auspices of an Old Line Primitive Baptist Church.
Neither scripture nor Primitive Baptist tradition support the establishment
of church connected youth camps. Therefore, we deem it an unscriptural
practice because its existence is not substantiated in the book of inspired
writ.
New innovations, in the church, cannot improve on the scriptural pattern
for teaching our children; i.e., "And ye fathers, provoke not your children to
wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord" (Eph.
6:4).
Item III, MISSION PROGRAMS
Mission programs organized by man and funded by appeals to various
congregations for their support are unscriptural. We find an organized
program to promote "mission work" without warrant in the scriptures,
especially a program in which no preacher goes to labor other than
infrequent visits of a few days. What saith the scriptures? Matt.10:5_10,
Acts 18:11; 20:31; 28:30, Gal. 1:15_17, II Tim. 4:5.
Primitive Baptists have no objections to their ministers doing evangelistic
work, among those who have not been privileged to have the gospel
preached to them, for Paul charged Timothy to "do the work of an
evangelist." Consequently, if a minister feels led of the Spirit to go, as an
evangelist, to a specific location, whether it be domestic or foreign, we
believe he should go. However, he should follow the New Testament
pattern of evangelism, that is, he should go to the area where he feels the
Spirit has directed him and remain there until converted brethren and
sisters are established in doctrine, practice and discipline (this may take
a few years). A failure to labor to this end, with those newly converted to
the gospel church, results in a great injustice to them and is an
embarrassment to established churches.
Item IV, THEOLOGICAL SEMINARIES (PREACHER'S SCHOOLS)
Seminaries train and educate preachers in the teachings of men, and so
direct their ministry according to man's standards. Brethren, make no
mistake, a five day seminar or preachers' meeting (school) is nothing but
a mini_seminary and will soon grow into a full_blown seminary. What saith
the scriptures? Heb. 5:4, Gal. 1:15_17, John 14:26; 16:13_14, I John 2:27.
A national preachers' meeting, which is a new thing among Primitive
Baptists, was introduced to our ministry in 1992. It continued, perpetually,
each year through the remainder of the decade of the 90s; if its
participants do not repent it will continue into the current millennium. This
event has been the source of more unrest among the Primitive Baptist
family than any other known activity or practice. It has caused, and
continues to cause, much disturbance throughout our country. The
disturbance and unrest is justified, abundantly, because such a meeting
does not have a scriptural foundation or precedent; it is a new and
superfluous thing among us. Furthermore, it is the bed where many of the
seeds of heresy are sown.
The activities engaged in by the attendees makes the referenced meeting
equivalent to a preachers' school (school of theology). We know that true
Old School Primitive Baptists declared against Theological Schools over
a hundred and sixty years ago. Our brethren from that era (1832) said it
better than we can. Therefore, we quote from the Black Rock Address:
"As to theological schools, we shall at present content ourselves with
saying that they are a reflection upon the faithfulness of the Holy Ghost,
who is engaged according to the promise of the great Head of the church
to lead the disciples into all truth. See John 16:13. Also, that in every age,
from the school of Alexandria down to this day, they have been a real pest
to the church of Christ. Of this we could produce abundant proof, did the
limits of our address admit their insertion." The firm convictions of those
who framed the Black Rock Address, is further echoed and amplified by
able ministers of the late 1800s and early 1900s. A quote from one, Elder
J. H. Oliphant, in the early 1900s, is as follows: "Here is a secret to
pastoring a Church. Teach [them] that everything new in religion is false,
and when elders get to be progressive and want to modernize our people,
avoid them, and encourage the members to be content with things taught
in the Word."
To those brethren who frequent and support this new function, we humbly
beseech you to repent and abandon your support thereof. Please help us
to circumvent further strife, within the family of God, about this auxiliary.
All of the above practices are without commandment or precedent in the
scriptures, and thus have no place in the Kingdom of God. "For
whatsoever is not of faith is sin." Rom. 14:23. [Have you read in God's
word where the Apostles ever held Bible study classes, Sunday Schools,
youth camps, or founded ministerial schools or mission programs?]
Item V, DEDICATION OF INFANTS
The dedication of infants in the church service is another practice for
which there is no New Testament basis, in either precept or example. In
this practice, the minister prays over the infant for the purpose of
"dedicating" him or her to the Lord, even when no evidence has been
shown that the infant has been regenerated or is even a member of God's
elect family. What saith the scriptures? John 3:3,5; I John 5:1
Item VI, SALARIED MINISTRY
By "salaried ministry," we are referring to a system of business
agreements in which a preacher agrees to serve a church with the
promise of receiving a stipulated payment of a set amount of money for
each given period. What saith the scriptures? Matt. 10:8; John 10:12_13;
Acts 20:33_34, 28:30; I Cor. 4:11_12, 9:16_18; I Peter 5:1_2.
The practice of churches (or preachers) establishing a fixed salary for
gospel ministers is in direct conflict with the teachings of the New
Testament. The Apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthian brethren: "What is
my reward then? Verily that, when I preach the gospel, I make the gospel
of God without charge, that I abuse not my power in the gospel" (I Cor.
9:18). We can judge from this statement that the apostle Paul would not
have even considered asking for a certain salary in return for his services
at a particular church. In the same chapter, Paul stated concerning gospel
ministers; "...he that ploweth should plow in hope..." (I Cor. 9:10). In a
system where there is an established salary, the minister is not "plowing
in hope."
Moreover, the salaried system is in conflict with the spiritual nature of
God's kingdom, which kingdom (Christ said) "is not of this world" (John
18:36). This system brings the following elements of the world into the
church; "hired" services, negotiated salaries, business propositions, pay
raises, the pursuit of large churches based upon higher salaries, and
moving from a small church to a larger church being considered as a
"promotion" (even if the small church is more spiritual).
Item VII, TITHING
Tithing as a commandment or example for the New Testament Church is
refuted by Rom. 6:14, I Cor. 16:1_2 and II Cor. 9:7.
Our brethren in the Armenian community recognize that "It (tithing _ D.
Jones) cannot be affirmed that the Old Testament law of tithes is binding
on the Christian Church" (Today's Dictionary of the Bible, page 624). In
chapter IX, under the caption "Characteristics of the Apostolic Church" of
Elder Hassell's History, he made a quote and statement as follows:
Quote, "The voluntary system" says Mr. Schaff, "best corresponds with the
spirit of the gospel, was practiced by the church for the first three
centuries, and is the most advantageous to the kingdom of God. Legal
enactments for the payment of tithes to the ministry, as to the priests
among the Jews, are not met with in Christendom before the sixth
century." Hassell's statement: "regular stipulated ministerial salaries,
though unknown in the apostolic church and in the first three centuries, are
given in nearly all the religious denominations of the United States, but not
among Old School, Primitive or Bible Baptists."
The tithes system was applicable to the Jewish economy, under the law,
in Old Testament times. It is not to be practiced in the New Testament
Gospel Church. Paul informed the Galatians that "the law is not of faith"
(Gal. 3:12). He also said, "But now we are delivered from the law, that
being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of
spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter" (Rom. 7:6).
Item VIII, THAT THE "GREAT COMMISSION" WAS GIVEN TO THE
CHURCH
We find no scriptural basis for the belief that the "great commission" was
given to the church and that the church is responsible for the spread of the
gospel in the world today and therefore is justified in organizing programs
and raising funds for this purpose. What saith the scriptures? Mark
16:14_15; Acts 1:2, 8; Col. 1:6, 23.
Shortly before His ascension, Christ commanded His apostles to
"go...into all the world, and preach the gospel unto every creature" (Mark
16:15). (This command is commonly referred to as the "great
commission," although this term is not found in the Scriptures). The
Scriptures make it abundantly clear that the apostles did indeed fulfill this
command. Several years after the command was given, the apostle Paul
reported that the gospel had come into "all the world" (Col. 1:6) and had
been "preached to every creature which is under heaven" (Col. 1:23).
Moreover, when Christ placed this "great commission" upon His apostles,
He promised them that great signs and wonders would accompany the
fulfilling of this commission. These signs would be in the form of special
apostolic powers, such as the ability to cast out demons and the ability to
drink any sort of deadly poison and remain unharmed (Mark 16:17_18).
We take the fact that these special powers are no longer with us as further
proof that the "great commission" has been fulfilled.
We stand with our Baptist forefathers in rejecting the heresy that the
"great commission" was given to the church body. Elder John R. Daily
(one of our Baptist forefathers) explained: "None of us believe that the
commission given by Christ to His apostles was intended to be laid upon
the church as a body, which false idea has been the parent of all
Missionary machinery that has ever been invented" (Advocate and
Messenger, "More Specificity Requested," July 1996, pg. 149).
Item IX, ACCEPTING UNQUALIFIED PERSONS AS CHURCH
MEMBERS
Encouraging children to join the church before there is evidence of the
new birth. Accepting baptism of questionable background or authority.
Not qualifying those who apply for membership as to secret orders, living
in adultery or evidence of the new birth. All of this speaks of a belief that
anything goes and any way is all right if it gets us more members. What
saith the scriptures? Acts 2:47; John 3:3,5; Neh. 2:20; Matt. 3:7.
Item X, MISDIRECTED MINISTERIAL AUTHORITY
For forty years or more, we have sat complacent, and passively listened
to our ministry criticize and chip away at some of our long_standing
church practices. While they criticized the existing church practices, they
were maneuvering themselves into a position of lordship rather than
servants; thus, usurping authority over the church. Both the church and
ministry are responsible for the development of this situation; i.e., the
lackadaisical attitude of the majority of the church membership coupled
with a misdirected zeal of some of our ministry.
Paul identified the ministry of his day as servants (II Cor. 4:5). Peter said
they were to "feed the flock of God...taking the oversight" (I Peter 5:2_3).
This did not mean to rule over or lord over God's heritage. We, as gospel
ministers, would do well to build on these scriptural foundations.
Historically, and in the main, the church has been cognizant of these
fundamental principles. An examination of a middle Georgia church's
decorum, which was constituted in mid_nineteenth century, reveals that
they delineated specifically the duties of a moderator, or pastor, which is
"It shall be the duty of the moderator to preserve order and explain and put
questions, and render assistance if needed." From this statement it is
evidenced that our forefathers recognized and respected their pastor as a
servant.
The idea that a pastor is supposed to rule the church and that his charge,
to the church, is to be followed implicitly and without any question is a new
thing in the Primitive Baptist Church. This doctrine leads to doing away
with annual pastor calls and conference meetings. The deacons and
members are taught that they are not to question this supposed pastoral
authority. This is often accompanied by instructions not to visit other
churches, associations or fellowship meetings (Prov. 19:10; Jer. 12:10;
Eph. 1:22_23; Isa. 32:1; Heb. 13:7, 17). Please note that the latter two
scriptural references do not speak of those who are rulers, but those who
have the rule (Christ and His princes, writers of N.T.).
Our prayer is that church members will recognize the fallacy of allowing
servants to rule. Also, that they will reclaim their authority and return to
church government as it was in earlier times. Furthermore, ministers may
need to be reminded, from time to time, that they are servants and not
lords. No matter how big a preacher may feel to be, he is still under the
jurisdiction of the church.
Item XI, ORDAINING NOVICES
Hastily ordaining unknown, untried and/or self_willed men to the gospel
ministry and to the office of deacon is a blatant violation of the scriptural
guidelines. What saith the scriptures? Neh. 7:64_65; 1 Tim. 3:6, 5:22;
Heb. 5:4.
Item XII, FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE CHURCH AUTHORITY
There are situations where brethren (especially preachers) and churches
fail to recognize the discipline of sister churches. When this occurs, it
generates strife among those involved and ripples of discontentment are
felt, where knowledge of it exists, throughout the Primitive Baptist family.
This problem has been addressed many times in the past and we
reiterate the advice given by brethren, in their respective eras, for the
resolution thereof: "When a person is excluded by an orderly Old Baptist
Church, he is thereby excluded from every orderly Old Baptist Church on
earth. If a person is excluded by one church in our body, and another
receives him into their body without satisfaction first being made at the
church where he was excluded, it is denied that a sister church has the
right to discipline her own members. It is too often the case that when a
little friction comes up, brethren may be quick to receive members this
way. When something is charged against a person, that is the only place
on earth to get the charge canceled" (Nashville Peace Meeting).
"Each and every local church has the right to dispose of her local affairs
as she deems proper; that is, she has a right to discipline her members,
but no church has the right to harbor and protect heretics, liars,
fornicators, and such like (excluded members from a sister church_W.
Hatfield), to the hurt and annoyance of sister churches. Neither does a
church have a right to harbor or engage in things that are contrary to
Baptist usage, or contrary to the scriptures" (Waco and Nashville Peace
Meetings).
"Should a church as such depart from the Bible faith and practice and so
persist in it as to cause offence, then what? The first church offended, as
represented by two or three of her most spiritual members (Gal. 6:1)
should go quietly and labor in love and all long_suffering to reclaim her,
failing, she should return and take one or two other churches to labor in
love; and these failing, and agreeing and advising, should proceed to
"bind her on earth" as in the name of Jesus Christ, declaring her
disposed of Gospel Order" (Dallas Peace Meeting).
To censure a church, or condemn a church, or non_fellowship a church or
churches in doctrine or practice, without labor, or trial or investigation is
disorder of the discipline, doctrine and practice of the church" (Dallas
Peace Meeting)
RESOLUTION STATEMENT
We have identified, in this addendum, some of the problematic issues
(little foxes) which are causing widespread unrest among Primitive
Baptists in this era. Applicable issues are itemized with scriptural
references which justify our opposition to their addition, as an adjunct
and/or practice, to the Old Line Primitive Baptist Church. We have also
included quotes of highly esteemed brethren, from the past, which depict
their stand against some of the unscriptural practices we are currently
facing.
As to our recommendation: We recommend that those who preach these
false doctrines, and/or otherwise advocate referenced practices, not to
be utilized (used) in our services. We are plainly instructed to "receive him
(them) not into your (our) house, neither bid him (them) God speed" (II
John 10). And those who follow after them are called "silly women
(churches)" (II Tim. 3:6).
Elder Sylvester Hassell writing on the early 1800"s mentions "the
incredible changes among Baptists" of that day "springing up of Mission
Societies, Sunday Schools, Theological colleges, written
sermons...salaried ministers...efforts for large gain in membership." He
summarized this in these words, which seem to us to appropriately
describe the condition existing among our people today: "False doctrines
led to false practices; confidence lost in God and placed in man"
(Hassell's History, page xxii).
Our brethren back then stood firmly against all of these institutions of man.
The Kehukee Association of North Carolina in 1827 agreed "that we
discard all Missionary Societies, Bible Societies and Theological
Seminaries, and if any persons should be among us as agents of any of
said societies, we hereafter discountenance them in those practices; and
if under a character of a minister of the gospel, WE WILL NOT INVITE
THEM INTO OUR PULPITS; believing these societies and institutions to
be the inventions of men, and not warranted from the word of God"
(Hassell's History, pages 736, 737). The Baltimore Association in 1832
meeting at Black Rock Church in the state of Maryland, also specifically
enumerated Sunday schools, mission programs and theological schools
as some of the practices which brought forth the division among Baptists
of that day ("Feast on Fat Things", pages 5_33).
Here in Georgia, the original articles of the constitution of the Original
Upper Canoochee Primitive Baptist Association of Georgia, and still
carried in their minutes today, state: "We decline to recognize anything
not specifically authorized in the New Testament and practiced by the
Apostles. We hold that modern Sunday Schools, religious societies and
organizations separate from the church, known as auxiliaries to the
church, a salaried ministry, assessing or taxing the membership,
instrument music in church worship are unscriptural, and together with
oath bound secret societies, will not be held in fellowship by this
association."
Where do we stand? Will we go along with the notions of the day until the
identity of the church is lost and we are just one of the hundreds of
religious organizations in America, the same in a lack of doctrine and
discipline and with a house full of worldly practices?
We pray that God will grant us the grace to walk in the old paths and to
contend for the faith once delivered to the saints!
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |